You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In Vitro Propagation of Ash ( Fraxinus excelsior L.) by Somatic Embryogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 16 |
| Book title |
Protocols for Micropropagation of Selected Economically-Important Horticultural Plants
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-074-8_16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-073-1, 978-1-62703-074-8
|
| Authors |
Maurizio Capuana, Capuana, Maurizio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 50% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,425,026
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,299
of 13,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,696
of 244,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#137
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.