You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Well-Differentiated Human Airway Epithelial Cell Cultures
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Human Cell Culture Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular medicine, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1385/1-59259-861-7:183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-222-3, 978-1-59259-861-8
|
| Authors |
M. Leslie Fulcher, Sherif Gabriel, Kimberlie A. Burns, James R. Yankaskas, Scott H. Randell, Fulcher, M. Leslie, Gabriel, Sherif, Burns, Kimberlie A., Yankaskas, James R., Randell, Scott H. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 440 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,789,794
of 24,261,860 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular medicine
#39
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,004
of 146,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular medicine
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,261,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.