You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Is Order Memory of Routes Temporal or Spatial? An Individual Differences Study
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Spatial Cognition X
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_6 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-968188-7, 978-3-31-968189-4
|
| Authors |
Ineke J. M. van der Ham, Suze de Zeeuw, Merel Braspenning, van der Ham, Ineke J. M., de Zeeuw, Suze, Braspenning, Merel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,834,382
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#892
of 8,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,892
of 326,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.