You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Isolation, propagation, and characterization of human umbilical cord perivascular cells (HUCPVCs).
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-060-7_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-797-6, 978-1-59745-060-7
|
| Authors |
Sarugaser R, Ennis J, Stanford WL, Davies JE, Rahul Sarugaser PhD, Jane Ennis MASc, William L. Stanford PhD, John E. Davies PhD, D Sc, Rahul Sarugaser, Jane Ennis, William L. Stanford, John E. Davies |
| Editors |
Julie Audet Ph.D, William L. Stanford Ph.D |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,863,888
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,704
of 13,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,703
of 169,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#49
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.