You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
GWAS and Meta-Analysis in Aging/Longevity
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Longevity Genes
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2404-2_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2403-5, 978-1-4939-2404-2
|
| Authors |
Linda Broer, Cornelia M. van Duijn |
| Editors |
Gil Atzmon, PhD |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,595,193
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#587
of 4,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,736
of 264,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.