You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Screening for Epstein–Barr Virus in Hodgkin's Lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Inflammation and Cancer
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-447-6_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-934115-14-5, 978-1-59745-447-6
|
| Authors |
Gulfaraz Khan, Khan, Gulfaraz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 60% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,604,410
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,713
of 14,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,000
of 183,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#68
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.