You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Isolation and Characterization of Distal Lung Progenitor Cells
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Somatic Stem Cells
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-815-3_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-814-6, 978-1-61779-815-3
|
| Authors |
Barbara Driscoll, Alex Kikuchi, Allison N. Lau, Jooeun Lee, Raghava Reddy, Edwin Jesudason, Carla F. Kim, David Warburton, Driscoll, Barbara, Kikuchi, Alex, Lau, Allison N., Lee, Jooeun, Reddy, Raghava, Jesudason, Edwin, Kim, Carla F., Warburton, David |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#970,131
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#75
of 14,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,645
of 250,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#4
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.