You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Liquidsoap: A High-Level Programming Language for Multimedia Streaming
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
SOFSEM 2011: Theory and Practice of Computer Science
|
| Published in |
arXiv, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-18381-2_8 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-218380-5, 978-3-64-218381-2
|
| Authors |
David Baelde, Romain Beauxis, Samuel Mimram, Baelde, David, Beauxis, Romain, Mimram, Samuel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 67% |
| Psychology | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,123,769
of 24,368,983 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#181,546
of 1,035,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,208
of 190,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#258
of 837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,368,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035,700 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.