↓ Skip to main content

DNA Damage Detection In Situ, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'DNA Damage Detection In Situ, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In Situ Detection of Apoptosis by the TUNEL Assay: An Overview of Techniques
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Combination of TUNEL Assay with Immunohistochemistry for Simultaneous Detection of DNA Fragmentation and Oxidative Cell Damage
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 EM-ISEL: A Useful Tool to Visualize DNA Damage at the Ultrastructural Level
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 In Situ Labeling of DNA Breaks and Apoptosis by T7 DNA Polymerase
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 In Situ Ligation: A Decade and a Half of Experience
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 In Situ Ligation Simplified: Using PCR Fragments for Detection of Double-Strand DNA Breaks in Tissue Sections
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 5′OH DNA Breaks in Apoptosis and Their Labeling by Topoisomerase-Based Approach
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detection of DNA strand breaks in apoptotic cells by flow- and image-cytometry.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Fluorochrome-labeled inhibitors of caspases: convenient in vitro and in vivo markers of apoptotic cells for cytometric analysis.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Combining Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization with the Comet Assay for Targeted Examination of DNA Damage and Repair
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Simultaneous Labeling of Single- and Double-Strand DNA Breaks by DNA Breakage Detection-FISH (DBD-FISH)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Co-localization of DNA Repair Proteins with UV-Induced DNA Damage in Locally Irradiated Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Ultrasound Imaging of Apoptosis: Spectroscopic Detection of DNA-Damage Effects at High and Low Frequencies
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Quantifying Etheno–DNA Adducts in Human Tissues, White Blood Cells, and Urine by Ultrasensitive 32 P-Postlabeling and Immunohistochemistry
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 ELISpot Assay as a Tool to Study Oxidative Stress in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Cytome Assay in Lymphocytes
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Buccal Micronucleus Cytome Assay
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 γ-H2AX detection in peripheral blood lymphocytes, splenocytes, bone marrow, xenografts, and skin.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Immunologic Detection of Benzo(a)pyrene–DNA Adducts
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Non-invasive Assessment of Oxidatively Damaged DNA: Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Urinary 8-Oxo-7,8-Dihydro-2′-Deoxyguanosine
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Assessing Sperm DNA Fragmentation with the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion Test
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Erratum to: Buccal Micronucleus Cytome Assay
Attention for Chapter 21: Assessing Sperm DNA Fragmentation with the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion Test
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Assessing Sperm DNA Fragmentation with the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion Test
Chapter number 21
Book title
DNA Damage Detection In Situ, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_21
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-408-1, 978-1-60327-409-8
Authors

José Luis Fernández, Dioleyda Cajigal, Carmen López-Fernández, Jaime Gosálvez, Fernández, José Luis, Cajigal, Dioleyda, López-Fernández, Carmen, Gosálvez, Jaime

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,554,540
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,342
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,825
of 181,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#69
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.