You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Modeling Cardiovascular Anatomy from Patient-Specific Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Advances in Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing
|
| Published in |
Computational methods in applied sciences, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4020-9086-8_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4020-9085-1, 978-1-4020-9086-8
|
| Authors |
Chandrajit Bajaj, Samrat Goswami, Bajaj, Chandrajit, Goswami, Samrat |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 40% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Computational methods in applied sciences
#1
of 8 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,194
of 170,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational methods in applied sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them