↓ Skip to main content

Variable and Non-spherical Stellar Winds in Luminous Hot Stars

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Direct observational evidence for magnetic fields in hot stars
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Direct observational evidence for magnetic fields in hot stars
Book title
Variable and Non-spherical Stellar Winds in Luminous Hot Stars
Published in
ADS, January 1999
DOI 10.1007/bfb0106360
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-065702-6, 978-3-54-049062-3
Authors

Gautier Mathys, Mathys, Gautier

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,313
of 37,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,980
of 99,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#48
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.