↓ Skip to main content

Arabidopsis Protocols, 2nd Edition

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Transient Expression Assay by Agroinfiltration of Leaves
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Transient Expression Assay by Agroinfiltration of Leaves
Book title
Arabidopsis Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2006
DOI 10.1385/1-59745-003-0:225
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-395-4, 978-1-59745-003-4
Authors

Min Woo Lee, Yinong Yang, Lee, Min Woo, Yang, Yinong

Abstract

An Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression assay has been described for in vivo analysis of constitutive or inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis plants. By simple infiltration of Agrobacterium cells carrying appropriate gene constructs into Arabidopsis leaves, transient expression assays can be performed within 3 d without using expensive instruments or complicated procedures. Two days after agroinfiltration, Arabidopsis plants can be treated with chemical inducers such as dexamethasone to induce transgene expression. The expression of the beta-glucoronidase (GUS) reporter gene can be determined by histochemical staining. In addition, RNA and protein can be extracted from agroinfected leaves and used for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Northern blot, Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and enzyme assays.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 184 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 25%
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 17%
Chemistry 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Chemical Engineering 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 24 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,671,669
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,563
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,982
of 155,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.