You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Detecting Symmetry in Cellular Automata Generated Patterns Using Swarm Intelligence
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Theory and Practice of Natural Computing
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-13749-0_8 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-913748-3, 978-3-31-913749-0
|
| Authors |
Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid, Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie, Robert Zimmer, Javaheri Javid, Mohammad Ali, Al-Rifaie, Mohammad Majid, Zimmer, Robert, al-Rifaie, Mohammad Majid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#7,014
of 8,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,947
of 362,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#271
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.