You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Generating Redundant Features with Unsupervised Multi-tree Genetic Programming
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Genetic Programming
|
| Published in |
arXiv, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-77553-1_6 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-977552-4, 978-3-31-977553-1
|
| Authors |
Andrew Lensen, Bing Xue, Mengjie Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 5 | 38% |
| Energy | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#539,124
of 946,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,669
of 329,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#17,250
of 22,362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22,362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.