↓ Skip to main content

Ricin and Shiga Toxins

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 176: Pathogenesis of Shiga-Toxin Producing Escherichia coli.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pathogenesis of Shiga-Toxin Producing Escherichia coli.
Chapter number 176
Book title
Ricin and Shiga Toxins
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/82_2011_176
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-227469-5, 978-3-64-227470-1
Authors

Angela Melton-Celsa, Krystle Mohawk, Louise Teel, Alison O’Brien, Melton-Celsa, Angela, Mohawk, Krystle, Teel, Louise, O’Brien, Alison

Abstract

Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are food-borne pathogens that cause hemorrhagic colitis and a serious sequela, the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). The largest outbreaks of STEC are due to a single E. coli serotype, O157:H7, although non-O157 serotypes also cause the same diseases. Two immunologically distinct Stxs are found in E. coli, Stx1 and Stx2. The Stxs are AB₅ toxins that halt protein synthesis in the host cell, a process that may lead to an apoptotic cell death. Stx-mediated damage to renal glomerular endothelial cells is hypothesized as the precipitating event for HUS. A subset of STEC referred to as the enterohemorrhagic E. coli has the capacity to intimately attach to and efface intestinal epithelial cells, a pathology called the A/E lesion. The A/E lesion is mediated by the adhesin intimin, its bacterially encoded receptor, Tir, and effectors secreted through a type III secretion system. The proteins needed for the A/E lesion are encoded within a large pathogenicity island called the locus of enterocyte effacement or LEE. There are several animal models for STEC infection, but no one model fully represents the spectrum of STEC illness. Currently there is no cure for STEC infection, and therapies are based mainly on alleviating symptoms. However, chimeric or humanized monoclonal antibodies have been developed that neutralize the Stxs, and those therapies may be able to prevent the development of HUS in an STEC-infected patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 135 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,234,609
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#446
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,458
of 126,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.