You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Binary Jumbled Pattern Matching on Trees and Tree-Like Structures
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 44 |
Book title |
Algorithms – ESA 2013
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-40450-4_44 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-240449-8, 978-3-64-240450-4
|
Authors |
Travis Gagie, Danny Hermelin, Gad M. Landau, Oren Weimann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,487
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,425
of 198,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#47
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.