↓ Skip to main content

Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Contemporary Approaches to Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Preparing Synthetic Aβ in Different Aggregation States
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation of Low-n Amyloid β-Protein Oligomers from Cultured Cells, CSF, and Brain
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Detecting Aβ * 56 Oligomers in Brain Tissues
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Assessing Aβ Aggregation State by Atomic Force Microscopy
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Measuring APP Carboxy-Terminal Fragments
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Detection of APP Intracellular Domain in Brain Tissue
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Cell-Based Assays for Regulators of Tau Biology
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Split GFP Complementation Assay for Quantitative Measurement of Tau Aggregation In Situ
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Apolipoprotein E Expression and Purification
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Aβ Toxicity in Primary Cultured Neurons
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Manipulation of Gene Expression in the Central Nervous System with Lentiviral Vectors
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Selecting a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Monitoring Spatial Learning and Memory in Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models Using the Morris Water Maze
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Step-by-Step In Situ Hybridization Method for Localizing Gene Expression Changes in the Brain
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Real-Time Visualization of Axonal Transport in Neurons
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Quantifying Biomarkers of Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuronal Network Hyperexcitability in Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease: Depletion of Calcium-Dependent Proteins and Inhibitory Hippocampal Remodeling
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Epigenetic Changes in the Brain: Measuring Global Histone Modifications
Attention for Chapter 18: Epigenetic Changes in the Brain: Measuring Global Histone Modifications
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Epigenetic Changes in the Brain: Measuring Global Histone Modifications
Chapter number 18
Book title
Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-744-0_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-743-3, 978-1-60761-744-0
Authors

Gavin Rumbaugh, Courtney A. Miller, Rumbaugh, Gavin, Miller, Courtney A.

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of research on the role of epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone protein acetylation and phosphorylation, in neuroscience. These changes exert control over gene expression and have been shown to play important roles in a variety of neural processes, including learning and memory. We and others have also recently shown that epigenetic changes may contribute to neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease. Western blot analysis with antibodies raised against specific histone modifications is a relatively simple technique able to reveal the type, location, and degree of histone posttranslational modifications produced by an experimental manipulation. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol for isolating histone proteins from tissue and measuring these posttranslational modifications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Mexico 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 68 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Neuroscience 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,318
of 13,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,432
of 385,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#152
of 975 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 975 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.