You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Gaussian maximum of entropy and reversed log-Sobolev inequality
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Séminaire de Probabilités XXXVI
|
| Published in |
arXiv, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-540-36107-7_5 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-000072-3, 978-3-54-036107-7
|
| Authors |
Djalil Chafaï, Chafaï, Djalil, Djalil Chafai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#169,697
of 946,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,752
of 129,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#73
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946,399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.