↓ Skip to main content

Georges Matheron Lecturer for the Year 2013: Professor Peter Alan Dowd

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Geosciences, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Georges Matheron Lecturer for the Year 2013: Professor Peter Alan Dowd
Published in
Mathematical Geosciences, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11004-014-9525-2

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 60%
Engineering 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,191,117
of 13,927,501 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Geosciences
#14
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,841
of 323,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Geosciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,927,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them