You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Comparison Between Agrobacterium -Mediated and Direct Gene Transfer Using the Gene Gun
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Biolistic DNA Delivery
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-110-3_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-109-7, 978-1-62703-110-3
|
| Authors |
Caixia Gao, Klaus K. Nielsen, Gao, Caixia, Nielsen, Klaus K. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,824,506
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,528
of 13,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,568
of 284,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#177
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.