↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Evolution of methods for assessing ciguatera toxins in fish.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evolution of methods for assessing ciguatera toxins in fish.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 1994
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-2656-7_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4612-7623-4, 978-1-4612-2656-7
Authors

Douglas L. Park, Park, Douglas L.

Abstract

Ciguatera toxins are odorless, tasteless, and generally undetectable by any simple chemical test; therefore, bioassays have traditionally been used to monitor suspect fish. Many native tests for toxicity in fish have been examined, including the discoloration of silver coins or copper wire or the repulsion of flies and ants, but all of these were rejected as invalid. Oral feeding of fish to cats or mongoose is a simple and relatively sensitive assay, but cats often regurgitate part of the meal. Feeding tests described above have been used in screening fish for toxicity, but they are cumbersome and nonquantitative. A mouse bioassay was developed; unfortunately, this procedure requires purification fish extracts, since mice are not very sensitive to ciguatoxin. An alternative to the use of mice is the mosquito bioassay, which was recently used to obtain a dose-response relationship between ingested ciguatoxin and clinical symptoms in man. This assay correlates reasonably well with cat and mouse bioassay. Many other bioassays have been developed using chicken, brine shrimp, and the guinea pig atrium. All traditional bioassays have one common disadvantage, the lack of specificity for individual toxins. Recent studies have also focused on the development of chemical methods, i.e., TLC and HPLC, for the detection and quantification of ciguatera-related toxins (okadaic acid and ciguatoxin and its analogs). Alternative assays based on immunochemical technology have been developed and show the greatest promise for use in seafood safety monitoring programs. For earlier methods (RIA and ELISA formats), liver extracts from ciguatoxic eels were used to prepare ciguatoxin antisera. The assay has been further adapted to a solid-phase immunobead assay (S-PIA), which has a very high potential for use as a marketplace screening tool to separate ciguateric fish. This assay can also be used to monitor reefs for ciguatera potential. Historically, attempts to validate methods used to measure ciguatera toxicity have been plagued with a lack of specificity and reference standards. These restrictions have been resolved, and a study is under way to evaluate the precision and accuracy of a low-cost, simplified field and laboratory S-PIA kit (Ciguatect, Hawaii Chemtect International, Pasadena, California, 91109), through an international interlaboratory trial using the AOAC/IUPAC validation mechanism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#68
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,512
of 71,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them