↓ Skip to main content

Quasispecies: Concept and Implications for Virology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Evolutionary influences in arboviral disease.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evolutionary influences in arboviral disease.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Quasispecies: Concept and Implications for Virology
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/3-540-26397-7_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-026395-1, 978-3-54-026397-5
Authors

Weaver SC, Weaver, S. C., S. C. Weaver

Abstract

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) generally require horizontal transmission by arthropod vectors among vertebrate hosts for their natural maintenance. This requirement for alternate replication in disparate hosts places unusual evolutionary constraints on these viruses, which have probably limited the evolution of arboviruses to only a few families of RNA viruses (Togaviridae, Flaviviridae, Bunyaviridae, Rhabdoviridae, Reoviridae, and Orthomyxoviridae) and a single DNA virus. Phylogenetic studies have suggested the dominance of purifying selection in the evolution of arboviruses, consistent with constraints imposed by differing replication environments and requirements in arthropod and vertebrate hosts. Molecular genetic studies of alphaviruses and flaviviruses have also identified several mutations that effect differentially the replication in vertebrate and mosquito cells, consistent with the view that arboviruses must adopt compromise fitness characteristics for each host. More recently, evidence of positive selection has also been obtained from these studies. However, experimental model systems employing arthropod and vertebrate cell cultures have yielded conflicting conclusions on the effect of alternating host infections, with host specialization inconsistently resulting in fitness gains or losses in the bypassed host cells. Further studies using in vivo systems to study experimental arbovirus evolution are critical to understanding and predicting disease emergence, which often results from virus adaptation to new vectors or amplification hosts. Reverse genetic technologies that are now available for most arbovirus groups should be exploited to test assumptions and hypotheses derived from retrospective phylogenetic approaches.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,731,211
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#207
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,629
of 66,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them