You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
CST++
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 34 |
| Book title |
String Processing and Information Retrieval
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-16321-0_34 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-216320-3, 978-3-64-216321-0
|
| Authors |
Ohlebusch, Enno, Fischer, Johannes, Gog, Simon, Enno Ohlebusch, Johannes Fischer, Simon Gog |
| Editors |
Edgar Chavez, Stefano Lonardi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,593,438
of 23,325,355 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,119
of 8,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,340
of 100,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,325,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.