↓ Skip to main content

Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy for Osteo-Degenerative Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy for Osteo-Degenerative Diseases'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Embryonic Stem Cells for Osteo-Degenerative Diseases
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Methods for Culturing Mouse and Human Embryonic Stem Cells
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Serum-free and feeder-free culture conditions for human embryonic stem cells.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Functional Assays for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Using cadherin expression to assess spontaneous differentiation of embryonic stem cells.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Generation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Carrying Lineage Specific Reporters
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Manipulations of MicroRNA in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Derivatives
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Large-Scale Expansion of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells on Microcarriers
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Embryoid Body Formation: Recent Advances in Automated Bioreactor Technology
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methods for embryoid body formation: the microwell approach.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitors: An Overview
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Derivation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Embryonic Stem Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into mesenchymal stem cells by the "raclure" method.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Improved Media Compositions for the Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells into Osteoblasts and Chondrocytes
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells in Self-Assembling Peptide Scaffolds
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Methods for Investigation of Osteoclastogenesis Using Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Absorption-Based Assays for the Analysis of Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Yield
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Identification of Osteoclasts in Culture
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Analysis of Glycosaminoglycans in Stem Cell Glycomics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Drill hole defects: induction, imaging, and analysis in the rodent.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Measurement and Illustration of Immune Interaction After Stem Cell Transplantation
Attention for Chapter 20: Drill hole defects: induction, imaging, and analysis in the rodent.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Drill hole defects: induction, imaging, and analysis in the rodent.
Chapter number 20
Book title
Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy for Osteo-Degenerative Diseases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-962-8_20
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-961-1, 978-1-60761-962-8
Authors

Andre Obenaus, Pedro Hayes, Obenaus, Andre, Hayes, Pedro

Abstract

Advances in stem therapy, scaffolds, and therapeutic biomolecules are accelerating bone repair research, and model systems are required to test new methods and concepts. The drill hole defect is one such model and is used to study a variety of bone defects and potential therapies designed to repair these injuries. We detail the methodologies required to successfully generate and evaluate drill hole defects. Although performing a successful drill hole defect requires patience and dexterity, investing the time to perfect the technique will provide ample opportunity for the researcher to expand his/her particular research interests. Mastering this technique will allow testing of stem cell therapies, novel scaffold designs, and biomolecules that can be used for clinical translation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,318
of 13,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,210
of 180,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#67
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.