↓ Skip to main content

Ergebnisse der exakten naturwissenschaften

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Theoretische Gesichtspunkte zur Deutung der kosmischen Strahlung
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Theoretische Gesichtspunkte zur Deutung der kosmischen Strahlung
Book title
Ergebnisse der exakten naturwissenschaften
Published in
ADS, January 1938
DOI 10.1007/bfb0112095
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-077193-7, 978-3-54-077194-4
Authors

H. Euler, W. Heisenberg, Euler, H., Heisenberg, W.

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,313
of 37,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.