↓ Skip to main content

Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: In vivo tumor formation from primate embryonic stem cells.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In vivo tumor formation from primate embryonic stem cells.
Book title
Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2006
DOI 10.1385/1-59745-037-5:459
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-498-2, 978-1-59745-037-9
Authors

Takayuki Asano, Kyoko Sasaki, Yoshihiro Kitano, Keiji Terao, Yutaka Hanazono, Asano, Takayuki, Sasaki, Kyoko, Kitano, Yoshihiro, Terao, Keiji, Hanazono, Yutaka

Abstract

To achieve human embryonic stem (ES) cell-based transplantation therapies, allogeneic transplantation models of nonhuman primates would be particularly useful. In this chapter, we describe an example of this model. We prepared cynomolgus ES cells genetically marked with the green fluorescent protein. The cells were transplanted into the allogeneic fetus because the fetus is immunologically premature and does not induce immune responses to transplanted cells. In addition, fetal tissue compartments are rapidly expanding, presumably providing space for engraftment. At 3 mo posttransplantation, a fluorescent teratoma, obviously derived from transplanted ES cells, was found in the fetus. However, transplanted cell progeny were also detected (approx 1%) in multiple fetal tissues. The cells were solitary and indistinguishable from surrounding host cells as assessed by in situ polymerase chain reaction. Transplanted cynomolgus ES cells can engraft in allogeneic fetuses. The cells will, however, form a tumor if they "leak" into an improper space, such as the thoracic cavity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,318
of 13,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,747
of 65,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them