↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical Modeling in Experimental Nutrition

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mathematical Modeling in Experimental Nutrition'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Balancing needs, efficiency, and functionality in the provision of modeling software: a perspective of the NIH WinSAAM Project.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Compartmental Modeling of Human Lactation
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Modeling Protein Turnover: A Module for Teaching Modeling
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Developing and Testing Integrated Multicompartment Models to Describe a Single-Input Multiple-Output Study Using the SAAM II Software System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Compartmental Models: Theory and Practice Using the SAAM II Software System
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Approaches to Population Kinetic Analysis with Application to Metabolic Studies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The Mathematics behind Modeling
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Distributing working versions of published mathematical models for biological systems via the Internet.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Measurement error and dietary intake.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Statistical Models for Quantitative Bioassay
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Statistical Issues in Assay Development and Use
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Statistical Tools for the Analysis of Nutrition Effects on the Survival of Cohorts
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Development of a Compartmental Model Describing the Dynamics of Vitamin A Metabolism in Men
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Compartmental Models of Vitamin A and β-Carotene Metabolism in Women
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The dynamics of folic acid metabolism in an adult given a small tracer dose of 14C-folic acid.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Human Zinc Metabolism: Advances in the Modeling of Stable Isotope Data
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Key Features of Copper versus Molybdenum Metabolism Models in Humans
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Insights into Bone Metabolism from Calcium Kinetic Studies in Children
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Modeling of Energy Expenditure and Resting Metabolic Rate during Weight Loss in Humans
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Development and Application of a Compartmental Model of 3-Methylhistidine Metabolism in Humans and Domestic Animals
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Modeling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Designing a Radioisotope Experiment Using a Dymamic, Mechanistic Model of Protein Turnover
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Protocol Development for Biological Tracer Studies
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Plasma Source Mass Spectrometry in Experimental Nutrition
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry as a Bioanalytical Tool for Nutritional Research
Attention for Chapter 15: The dynamics of folic acid metabolism in an adult given a small tracer dose of 14C-folic acid.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The dynamics of folic acid metabolism in an adult given a small tracer dose of 14C-folic acid.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Mathematical Modeling in Experimental Nutrition
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 1998
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-1959-5_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4899-1961-8, 978-1-4899-1959-5
Authors

A J Clifford, A Arjomand, S R Dueker, P D Schneider, B A Buchholz, J S Vogel, Clifford, Andrew J., Arjomand, Ali, Dueker, Stephen R., Schneider, Philip D., Buchholz, Bruce A., Vogel, John S., Andrew J. Clifford, Ali Arjomand, Stephen R. Dueker, Philip D. Schneider, Bruce A. Buchholz, John S. Vogel

Abstract

Folate is an essential nutrient that is involved in many metabolic pathways, including amino acid interconversions and nucleotide (DNA) synthesis. In genetically susceptible individuals and populations, dysfunction of folate metabolism is associated with severe illness. Despite the importance of folate, major gaps exist in our quantitative understanding of folate metabolism in humans. The gaps exist because folate metabolism is complex, a suitable animal model that mimics human folate metabolism has not been identified, and suitable experimental protocols for in vivo studies in humans are not developed. In general, previous studies of folate metabolism have used large doses of high specific activity tritium and 14C-labeled folates in clinical patients. While stable isotopes such as deuterium and 13C-labeled folate are viewed as ethical alternatives to radiolabeled folates for studying metabolism, the lack of sensitive mass spectrometry methods to quantify them has impeded advancement of the field using this approach. In this chapter, we describe a new approach that uses a major analytical breakthrough, Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). Because AMS can detect attomole concentrations of 14C, small radioactive dosages (nCi) can be safely administered to humans and traced over long periods of time. The needed dosages are sufficiently small that the total radiation exposure is only a fraction of the natural annual background radiation of Americans, and the generated laboratory waste may legally be classified non-radioactive in many cases. The availability of AMS has permitted the longest (202 d) and most detailed study to date of folate metabolism in a healthy adult human volunteer. Here we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach and illustrate its potential by determining empirical kinetic values of folate metabolism. Our data indicate that the mean sojourn time for folate is in the range of 93 to 120 d. It took > or = 350 d for the absorbed portion of small bolus dose of 14C-folic acid to be eliminated completely from the body.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Engineering 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2009.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,227
of 4,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,478
of 93,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.