You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Microarray Technology and Its Applications for Detecting Plasma microRNA Biomarkers in Digestive Tract Cancers.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Microarray Technology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3136-1_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3135-4, 978-1-4939-3136-1
|
| Authors |
Konishi, Hirotaka, Ichikawa, Daisuke, Arita, Tomohiro, Otsuji, Eigo, Hirotaka Konishi, Daisuke Ichikawa, Tomohiro Arita, Eigo Otsuji |
| Abstract |
Many cancers are known to be regulated by microRNAs (miRNAs), and the relationships between tissue miRNA expression levels and the amounts of miRNA circulating in the plasma (or plasma miRNA) have been examined in many types of cancers, including digestive tract cancers. The role of plasma miRNAs has yet to be elucidated in detail; therefore a comprehensive analysis of plasma miRNAs using microarrays should assist in establishing the utility of liquid biopsy or companion diagnosis. We here described the 3D-Gene(®) miRNA microarray (TORAY) currently used in our laboratory and introduced a trial application in digestive tract cancer diagnosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,300,128
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,302
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,843
of 393,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#542
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.