You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Clinical Trials of Cardiac Repair with Adult Bone Marrow- Derived Cells
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 15 |
| Book title |
Cellular Cardiomyoplasty
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-511-8_15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-510-1, 978-1-62703-511-8
|
| Authors |
Vinodh Jeevanantham, Mohammad R. Afzal, Ewa K. Zuba-Surma, Buddhadeb Dawn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,348,897
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,344
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,535
of 279,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.