↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Cellular Cardiomyoplasty

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Cellular Cardiomyoplasty'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Cellular Cardiomyoplasty: Its Past, Present, and Future
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Bone Marrow Stem Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Isolation, Expansion, and Characterization
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Cardiac Side Population Cells and Sca-1-Positive Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Two-Step Protocol for Isolation and Culture of Cardiospheres
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Generation of Human iPSCs from Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Using Non-integrative Sendai Virus in Chemically Defined Conditions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Identification of Stem Cells After Transplantation.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Methods to Study the Proliferation and Differentiation of Cardiac Side Population (CSP) Cells.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Immune Responses After Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Route of Delivery, Cell Retention, and Efficiency of Polymeric Microcapsules in Cellular Cardiomyoplasty.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Angiogenic Nanodelivery Systems for Myocardial Therapy.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Bio-hybrid Tissue Engineering for Cellular Cardiomyoplasty: Future Directions
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Decellularized Whole Heart for Bioartificial Heart.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Trials of Cardiac Repair with Adult Bone Marrow- Derived Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Clinical Study Using Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal-Like Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.
Attention for Chapter 16: Clinical Study Using Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal-Like Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clinical Study Using Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal-Like Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Cellular Cardiomyoplasty
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-511-8_16
Pubmed ID
23807797
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-510-1, 978-1-62703-511-8
Authors

Panfilov IA, de Jong R, Takashima SI, Duckers HJ, Ilia Alexander Panfilov, Renate de Jong, Shin-ichiro Takashima, Henricus J. Duckers

Abstract

Adipose tissue represents an abundant, accessible source of regenerative cells that can be easily obtained in sufficient amount for therapy. Adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRC) are comprised of leukocytes, smooth muscles, endothelial cells, and mesenchymal stem cells. In contrast to bone-marrow-derived MSC, the abundance of adipose tissue in patients and the higher frequency per unit mass of regenerative cells allow for the isolation of cells in therapeutic meaningful amounts in less than 2h after donor tissue acquisition.Harvest of adipose tissue can thus follow primary PCI, allowing efficient treatment within 24h. This obviates the need for extensive cell culturing in GMP clean room facilities and makes ADSCs a promising and practical autologous cell source. In the following chapter, we will describe the liposuction procedure for stem cell harvest, two cell delivery techniques, and pressure/volume loop analysis for the follow-up of our patients enrolled in the clinical studies.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Engineering 4 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,369
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,852
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,015
of 194,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.