↓ Skip to main content

Query complexity, or why is it difficult to separateNPA∩coNPA fromPA by random oraclesA?

Overview of attention for article published in Combinatorica, December 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Query complexity, or why is it difficult to separateNPA∩coNPA fromPA by random oraclesA?
Published in
Combinatorica, December 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02125350
Authors

G. Tardos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Researcher 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 80%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,427,950
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#64
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,386
of 58,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them