↓ Skip to main content

Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: NSAIDs for the chemoprevention of Alzheimer's disease.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
NSAIDs for the chemoprevention of Alzheimer's disease.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Diseases
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/1-4020-5688-5_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4020-5687-1, 978-1-4020-5688-8
Authors

Szekely CA, Town T, Zandi PP, Szekely, Christine A., Town, Terrence, Zandi, Peter P., Christine A. Szekely, Terrence Town, Peter P. Zandi

Abstract

Epidemiologic and laboratory studies suggest that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use reduces the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Initial reports in the early 1990's indicated that a history of arthritis, a presumed surrogate of NSAID use, was associated with a lower risk of AD. [1] These reports were followed by epidemiologic studies in which NSAID use was assessed directly and the majority of these reports confirmed the inverse association with risk for AD. [2, 3] Postmortem studies in humans [4], studies in animal models of AD [5, 6], and in vitro studies [7, 8] generally support the notion that NSAIDs can reduce the deleterious inflammation which surrounds amyloid beta (Abeta) plaques in the AD brain. In addition, some studies conducted in vitro and in rodents point to a subgroup of NSAIDs that may work by inhibiting amyloidogenic APP metabolism rather than through traditional anti-inflammatory mechanisms. [9-11] This novel property of NSAIDs is currently being explored in epidemiologic studies. Results from randomized clinical trials of NSAIDs and established AD and one trial on secondary prevention have not been promising and there have been no prevention trials completed. The feasibility of using NSAIDs as a chemopreventive agent in AD is discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Chemistry 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#110
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,017
of 156,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.