You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editoral: The Publishing Gap Between Rich and Poor: the Focus of AuthorAID
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Public Health Policy, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200071 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phyllis Freeman, Anthony Robbins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#348
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,671
of 64,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them