You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Theory of Cryptography
|
---|---|
Published by |
ADS, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-00457-5 |
ISBNs |
978-3-64-200456-8, 978-3-64-200457-5
|
Editors |
Omer Reingold |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,905,574
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#4,698
of 38,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,944
of 172,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#146
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.