↓ Skip to main content

TT Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: History of discoveries and pathogenicity of TT viruses.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
History of discoveries and pathogenicity of TT viruses.
Chapter number 1
Book title
TT Viruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70972-5_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-070971-8, 978-3-54-070972-5
Authors

Okamoto H, H. Okamoto, Okamoto, H.

Abstract

Since 1997, groups of novel nonenveloped DNA viruses with a circular, single-stranded (negative sense) DNA genome of 3.6-3.9 kb, 3.2 kb, or 2.8-2.9 kb in size have been discovered and designated Torque teno virus (TTV), Torque teno midi virus (TTMDV), and Torque teno mini virus (TTMV), respectively, in the floating genus Anellovirus. These three anelloviruses frequently and ubiquitously infect humans, and the infections are characterized by lifelong viremia and great genetic variability. Although TTV infection has been epidemiologically suggested to be associated with many diseases including liver diseases, respiratory disorders, hematological disorders, and cancer, there is no direct causal evidence for links between TTV infection and specific clinical diseases. The pathogenetic role of TTMV and TTMDV infections remains unknown. The changing ratio of the three anelloviruses to each other over time, relative viral load, or combination of different genotype(s) of each anellovirus may be associated with the pathogenicity or the disease-inducing potential of these three human anelloviruses. To clarify their disease association, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems for accurately detecting, differentiating, and quantitating all of the genotypes and/or genogroups of TTV, TTMDV, and TTMV should be established and standardized, as should methods to detect past infections and immunological responses to anellovirus infections.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,272,356
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#86
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,145
of 93,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.