↓ Skip to main content

Mouse Retinal Phenotyping

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mouse Retinal Phenotyping'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Morphological Survey from Neurons to Circuits of the Mouse Retina
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Measuring Retinal Function in the Mouse
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Modeling Retinal Diseases Using Genetic Approaches in Mice
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Cell Culture Analysis of the Phagocytosis of Photoreceptor Outer Segments by Primary Mouse RPE Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Two-Photon Microscopy (TPM) and Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) of Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) of Mice In Vivo
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 RPE Visual Cycle and Biochemical Phenotypes of Mutant Mouse Models
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Use of Direct Current Electroretinography for Analysis of Retinal Pigment Epithelium Function in Mouse Models
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Disruption of Rhodopsin Dimerization in Mouse Rod Photoreceptors by Synthetic Peptides Targeting Dimer Interface
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Experimental Approaches for Defining the Role of the Ca2+-Modulated ROS-GC System in Retinal Rods of Mouse
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Microglia Analysis in Retinal Degeneration Mouse Models
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Determination of Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption in the Retina Ex Vivo: Applications for Retinal Disease
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Analysis of Feedback Signaling from Horizontal Cells to Photoreceptors in Mice
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Assessment of the Absolute Excitatory Level of the Retina by Flicker ERG
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Ex Vivo Functional Evaluation of Synaptic Transmission from Rods to Rod Bipolar Cells in Mice
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Functional and Morphological Analysis of OFF Bipolar Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Immunohistochemical Phenotyping of Mouse Amacrine Cell Subtypes
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Phenotyping of Gap-Junctional Coupling in the Mouse Retina
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Ganglion Cell Assessment in Rodents with Retinal Degeneration
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Morphological Identification of Melanopsin-Expressing Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtypes in Mice
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Functional Assessment of Melanopsin-Driven Light Responses in the Mouse: Multielectrode Array Recordings
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 In Vitro Assays for Mouse Müller Cell Phenotyping Through microRNA Profiling in the Damaged Retina
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Analysis of Retinal Vascular Plexuses and Interplexus Connections
Attention for Chapter 16: Immunohistochemical Phenotyping of Mouse Amacrine Cell Subtypes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Immunohistochemical Phenotyping of Mouse Amacrine Cell Subtypes
Chapter number 16
Book title
Mouse Retinal Phenotyping
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7720-8_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7719-2, 978-1-4939-7720-8
Authors

Denize Atan

Abstract

The retina shares its embryological origin with the central nervous system (CNS), so the neural circuitry of the retina has long been considered to be a relatively simple model of the neural networks in the brain, sharing similar morphologies, neurotransmitters, and receptors. Amacrine cells are, by far, the largest group of inhibitory neurons in the retina that also have the most diverse range of phenotypes of any retinal neuron. Here, I describe an approach, using immunolabeling of cryosections, to identify different subclasses of amacrine cell in the mouse retina.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 40%
Psychology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,498,204
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,391
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,827
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.