↓ Skip to main content

Data integration in the life sciences : third international workshop, DILS 2006, Hinxton, UK, July 20-22, 2006 : proceedings

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Data integration in the life sciences : third international workshop, DILS 2006, Hinxton, UK, July 20-22, 2006 : proceedings'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Application Driven Perspective on Biological Data Integration
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Towards a National Healthcare Information Infrastructure
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Data Access and Integration in the ISPIDER Proteomics Grid
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Cell-Cycle Knowledge Integration Framework
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Link Discovery in Graphs Derived from Biological Databases
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Towards an Automated Analysis of Biomedical Abstracts
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Improving Text Mining with Controlled Natural Language: A Case Study for Protein Interactions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 SNP-Converter: An Ontology-Based Solution to Reconcile Heterogeneous SNP Descriptions for Pharmacogenomic Studies
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 SABIO-RK: Integration and Curation of Reaction Kinetics Data
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 SIBIOS Ontology: A Robust Package for the Integration and Pipelining of Bioinformatics Services
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Data Structures for Genome Annotation, Alternative Splicing, and Validation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 BioFuice: Mapping-Based Data Integration in Bioinformatics
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Method for Similarity-Based Grouping of Biological Data
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 On Querying OBO Ontologies Using a DAG Pattern Query Language
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using Term Lists and Inverted Files to Improve Search Speed for Metabolic Pathway Databases
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Arevir: A Secure Platform for Designing Personalized Antiretroviral Therapies Against HIV
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The Distributed Annotation System for Integration of Biological Data
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 An Information Management System for Collaboration Within Distributed Working Environment
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Ontology Analysis on Complexity and Evolution Based on Conceptual Model
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Distributed Execution of Workflows in the INB
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Knowledge Networks of Biological and Medical Data: An Exhaustive and Flexible Solution to Model Life Science Domains
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Data Integration in the Life Sciences
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Collection-Oriented Scientific Workflows for Integrating and Analyzing Biological Data
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Towards a Model of Provenance and User Views in Scientific Workflows
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 An Extensible Light-Weight XML-Based Monitoring System for Sequence Databases
Attention for Chapter 21: Knowledge Networks of Biological and Medical Data: An Exhaustive and Flexible Solution to Model Life Science Domains
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Knowledge Networks of Biological and Medical Data: An Exhaustive and Flexible Solution to Model Life Science Domains
Chapter number 21
Book title
Data Integration in the Life Sciences
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/11799511_21
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-036593-8, 978-3-54-036595-2
Authors

Sascha Losko, Karsten Wenger, Wenzel Kalus, Andrea Ramge, Jens Wiehler, Klaus Heumann, Losko, Sascha, Wenger, Karsten, Kalus, Wenzel, Ramge, Andrea, Wiehler, Jens, Heumann, Klaus

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,486
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,752
of 65,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.