↓ Skip to main content

T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Th1/Th2 Cell's Function in Immune System.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Th1/Th2 Cell's Function in Immune System.
Chapter number 3
Book title
T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9487-9_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-179486-2, 978-9-40-179487-9
Authors

Zhang Y, Gu W, He L, Sun B, Yuan Zhang, Yaguang Zhang, Wangpeng Gu, Lan He, Bing Sun

Abstract

CD4+ T helper cells regulate appropriate cellular and humoral immune responses to a wide range of pathogens and get involved in many diseases progress. The balance of the earliest determined CD4+ T helper cell subsets, Th1 and Th2, play an important role in allergy and autoimmune diseases. During the research, Animal models in immunology research are necessary and always the powerful tools for the basic scientific research. With the new sequence technologies, the finding of key gene mutation in Th1/Th2 cells has been proved to be related to human diseases. Here, we review four animal models about four key genes in Th1/Th2 cells to introduce the balance between Th1/Th2 cells. Furthermore, the related genetic mutations in human diseases and the new therapies are reviewed in this chapter, which show the importance of Th1/Th2 cells in human diseases further.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,745,035
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,091
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,096
of 252,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#33
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.