↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Antibodies

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: From Laboratory to Clinic: The Story of CAMPATH-1
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
From Laboratory to Clinic: The Story of CAMPATH-1
Book title
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Antibodies
Published in
Methods in molecular medicine, August 2000
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-076-4:243
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-59259-076-6, 978-0-89603-798-4
Authors

Hale, Geoff, Waldmann, Herman, Geoff Hale, Herman Waldmann

Abstract

In 1890 it was shown that resistance to diphtheria toxin could be transferred from one animal to another by transfer of serum (1). From this discovery, passive antibody therapy was developed as an effective treatment for infectious diseases and for neutralization of toxins, and continues to be used to this day. Meanwhile, there have been continued efforts to use antibodies for cancer therapy, starting with the pioneering work of Hericourt and Richet in 1895 (2), which was the forerunner of the "magic bullet" concept. However, all of the early work on tumor therapy led ultimately to disappointment (3). The problems were readily acknowledged, i.e., lack of specificity and reproducibility, lack of purity, and the xenogeneic immune response. Developments over the past 20 years, as described throughout this book, have effectively overcome all of these technical problems, often in very ingenious ways. The difficulty we have now is different. There are just too many potential new antibody-based treatments for them all to be properly evaluated in the clinic. Many will still fail because of factors that are hard to predict from experiments: unexpected toxicity, biological heterogeneity of the target disease, or lack of access to the appropriate tissue.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular medicine
#9
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,199
of 37,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them