↓ Skip to main content

Protein-Ligand Interactions

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Measurement of solvent accessibility at protein-protein interfaces.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measurement of solvent accessibility at protein-protein interfaces.
Book title
Protein-Ligand Interactions
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, June 2005
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-912-5:065
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-372-5, 978-1-59259-912-7
Authors

Jeffrey G. Mandell, Abel Baerga-Ortiz, Arnold M. Falick, Elizabeth A. Komives, Mandell, Jeffrey G., Baerga-Ortiz, Abel, Falick, Arnold M., Komives, Elizabeth A.

Abstract

Methods are presented for monitoring solvent accessibility of protein-ligand and protein-protein interfaces. The kinetics of solvent accessibility at the protein-protein interface is monitored by amide hydrogen/deuterium (H/2H) exchange detected by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). A straightforward theoretical analysis is presented for determining the concentration of a weakly binding ligand that is required for achieving a situation in which the receptor is essentially 100% bound, and this is verified by control experiments. We show that when the receptor is essentially 100% bound it is possible to distinguish amide exchange as a result of solvent accessibility at the interface from amide exchange caused by complex dissociation. Methods are also presented for the measurement of tightly bound complexes of large interactions such as antibody-antigen complexes. Quantitation of the number of amides sequestered at the interface can be related to the number of H2O molecules excluded from the interface.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 37%
Chemistry 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,280
of 57,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.