↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous Gene Expression in E.coli

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterologous Gene Expression in E.coli'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Adjustment of Codon Usage Frequencies by Codon Harmonization Improves Protein Expression and Folding
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 SUMO fusion technology for enhanced protein expression and purification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Molecular and Chemical Chaperones for Improving the Yields of Soluble Recombinant Proteins
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Genetic Selection of Solubility-Enhanced Proteins Using the Twin-Arginine Translocation System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Protein Folding Liquid Chromatography
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Site-Specific Protein Labeling by Intein-Mediated Protein Ligation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Efficient Expression of Human Aromatase (CYP19) in E. coli
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Expression of Recombinant Cytochromes c in E. coli
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Semi-synthesis of Glycoproteins from E. coli Through Native Chemical Ligation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Expression of Recombinant Proteins with Uniform N-Termini
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Recent Developments in Difficult Protein Expression: A Guide to E. coli Strains, Promoters, and Relevant Host Mutations
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Periplasmic chaperones used to enhance functional secretion of proteins in E. coli.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Engineering Unusual Amino Acids into Peptides Using Lantibiotic Synthetase
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Heterologous Gene Expression in E.coli
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Detection of Protein–Protein Interactions in Bacteria by GFP-Fragment Reconstitution
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Enhancing the solubility of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli by using hexahistidine-tagged maltose-binding protein as a fusion partner.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Introducing Predetermined Mutations Throughout a Target Gene Using TDEM (Transposon-Directed Base-Exchange Mutagenesis)
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Fluorescent Site-Specific Labeling of Escherichia coli Expressed Proteins with Sfp Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase
Attention for Chapter 2: SUMO fusion technology for enhanced protein expression and purification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
SUMO fusion technology for enhanced protein expression and purification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Heterologous Gene Expression in E.coli
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61737-967-3_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61737-966-6, 978-1-61737-967-3
Authors

Raymond J. Peroutka III, Steven J. Orcutt, James E. Strickler, Tauseef R. Butt, Peroutka III, Raymond J., Orcutt, Steven J., Strickler, James E., Butt, Tauseef R.

Abstract

The preparation of sufficient amounts of high-quality protein samples is the major bottleneck for structural proteomics. The use of recombinant proteins has increased significantly during the past decades. The most commonly used host, Escherichia coli, presents many challenges including protein misfolding, protein degradation, and low solubility. A novel SUMO fusion technology appears to enhance protein expression and solubility ( http://www.lifesensors.com ). Efficient removal of the SUMO tag by SUMO protease in vitro facilitates the generation of target protein with a native N-terminus. In addition to its physiological relevance in eukaryotes, SUMO can be used as a powerful biotechnology tool for enhanced functional protein expression in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 127 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 28%
Chemistry 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,919
of 180,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#67
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.