↓ Skip to main content

Mineral Absorption in the Monogastric GI Tract

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: On the Molecular Mechanism of Intestinal Calcium Transport
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
On the Molecular Mechanism of Intestinal Calcium Transport
Chapter number 5
Book title
Mineral Absorption in the Monogastric GI Tract
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 1989
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-9111-1_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4684-9113-5, 978-1-4684-9111-1
Authors

Robert H. Wasserman, Curtis S. Fullmer, Wasserman, Robert H., Fullmer, Curtis S.

Abstract

The intestinal absorption of calcium is certainly a complex process, dependent on several factors of which vitamin D, via 1,25(OH)2D3, is the major controlling hormone. The efficiency of calcium absorption is a function of calcium status and calcium need. As the body's demand for calcium increases, the process commonly termed, adaptation, is activated in which the synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D3 from precursor is increased, resulting in the stimulation of the rate of calcium absorption. The increased demand for calcium might result from the ingestion of a diet deficient in calcium, from growth, pregnancy, lactation and egg shell formation in the laying hen. Accomapanying the change in calcium absorptive efficiency are molecular modifications of the transporting enterocytes, some mentioned herein and elsewhere (Wasserman & Chandler, 1985; Wasserman, 1980; Wasserman et al., 1984). Highly correlated with the rate of calcium absorption under a wide variety of conditions is the concentration of the vitamin D-induced calcium-binding protein, calbindin-D28K (avian type) and calbindin-D9K (mammalian intestinal type). The role of calbindin-D in this transport process is not precisely known but is considered to act at the present time as a cytosolic facilitator of Ca2+ diffusion from the brush border membrane to the basolateral membrane. In addition to the induction of calbindin-D synthesis, 1,25(OH)2D3 exerts other effects on the intestinal epithelium that can have consequences on the calcium absorptive process. Some of these effects are summarized in Figure 14. Vitamin D-dependent reactions might be either direct effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 or indirect effects due to elevated intracellular Ca2+ concentrations. These include changes in the fluidity of the brush border membrane, an increase in microvillar alkaline phosphatase-low affinity Ca-activated ATPase activity, an association of calmodulin with the 105 kD brush border cytoskeletal protein and, following calbindin D synthesis, the binding of calbindin D to a 60 kD brush border protein and to microtubules. The latter has been suggested to be related to the proposed transfer of Ca2+ by an endocytotic-exocytotic mechanism. In addition, a vitamin D-dependent intestinal membrane calcium-binding protein has been identified (Kowarski & Schachter, 1980). Playing into this multi-component system is a stimulation of cyclic nucleotide synthesis by 1,25(OH)2D3 which, through activation of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases, might modify membrane Ca2+ "channels" by phosphorylation reactions.4+ Intracellular organelles, i.e., the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, the Golgi apparatus, are potent sequesters of Ca2+ and could contribute to the protection of the cell from excessively high Ca2+ concentrations by transiently storing absorbed Ca2+.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,226
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,231
of 53,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.