↓ Skip to main content

NMR of Proteins and Small Biomolecules

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 216: NMR as a Unique Tool in Assessment and Complex Determination of Weak Protein–Protein Interactions
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
NMR as a Unique Tool in Assessment and Complex Determination of Weak Protein–Protein Interactions
Chapter number 216
Book title
NMR of Proteins and Small Biomolecules
Published in
Topics in current chemistry, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/128_2011_216
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-228916-3, 978-3-64-228917-0
Authors

Olga Vinogradova, Jun Qin, Vinogradova O, Qin J

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are crucial for a wide variety of biological processes. These interactions range from high affinity (K (d)<nM) to very low affinity (K (d)>mM). While much is known about the nature of high affinity protein complexes, our knowledge about structural characteristics of weak protein-protein interactions (wPPIs) remains limited: in addition to the technical difficulties associated with their investigation, historically wPPIs used to be considered physiologically irrelevant. However, emerging evidence suggests that wPPIs, either in the form of intact protein complexes or as part of large molecular machineries, are fundamentally important for promoting rapid on/off switches of signal transduction, reversible cell-cell contacts, transient assembly/disassembly of signaling complexes, and enzyme-substrate recognition. Therefore an atomic-level elucidation of wPPIs is vital to understanding a cornucopia of diverse cellular events. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is famous for its unique abilities to study wPPIs and, by utilization of the new technical developments combined with sparse data based computational analysis, it now allows rapid identification and structural characterization of wPPIs. Here we present our perspective on the NMR methods employed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 34%
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Chemistry 11 19%
Engineering 4 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,680,234
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Topics in current chemistry
#56
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,430
of 403,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in current chemistry
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.