You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Stem cell sources for regenerative medicine.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-060-7_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-797-6, 978-1-59745-060-7
|
| Authors |
Ali M. Riazi, Sarah Y. Kwon PhD, William L. Stanford PhD, Sarah Y. Kwon, William L. Stanford, Riazi, Ali M., Kwon, Sarah Y., Stanford, William L. |
| Editors |
Julie Audet Ph.D, William L. Stanford Ph.D |
| Abstract |
Tissue-resident stem cells or primitive progenitors play an integral role in homeostasis of most organ systems. Recent developments in methodologies to isolate and culture embryonic and somatic stem cells have many new applications poised for clinical and preclinical trials, which will enable the potential of regenerative medicine to be realized. Here, we overview the current progress in therapeutic applications of various stem cells and discuss technical and social hurdles that must be overcome for their potential to be realized. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,422
of 167,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#60
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.