↓ Skip to main content

Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions
Published in
Polar Biology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9
Authors

I. Parnikoza, A. Rozhok, P. Convey, M. Veselski, J. Esefeld, R. Ochyra, O. Mustafa, C. Braun, H.-U. Peter, J. Smykla, V. Kunakh, I. Kozeretska

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,176,150
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#212
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,031
of 461,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.