↓ Skip to main content

Pyrosequencing® Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: The history of pyrosequencing.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The history of pyrosequencing.
Book title
Pyrosequencing® Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2006
DOI 10.1385/1-59745-377-3:1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-645-0, 978-1-59745-377-6
Authors

Nyrén P, Pål Nyrén, Nyrén, Pål

Abstract

One late afternoon in the beginning of January 1986, bicycling from the lab over the hill to the small village of Fullbourn, the idea for an alternative DNA sequencing technique came to my mind. The basic concept was to follow the activity of DNA polymerase during nucleotide incorporation into a DNA strand by analyzing the pyrophosphate released during the process. Today, the technique is used in multidisciplinary fields in academic, clinical, and industrial settings all over the word. The technique can be used for both single-base sequencing and whole-genome sequencing, depending on the format used. In this chapter I will give my personal account of the development of Pyrosequencing--beginning on a winter day in 1986, when I first envisioned the method--until today, nearly 20 yr later. I will conclude with future prospects for the method.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 115 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 29%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Chemistry 7 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,259,019
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#398
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,806
of 156,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.