↓ Skip to main content

Anxiety and Anxiolytic Drugs

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Anxiety and Anxiolytic Drugs'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Learning and Memory
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Animal Models of Anxiety
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Genetic Alterations of the Murine Serotonergic Gene Pathway: The Neurodevelopmental Basis of Anxiety
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Mutagenesis and Knockout Models: Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Mutagenesis and Knockout Models: NK1 and Substance P
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Genetic Epidemiology of Anxiety Disorders
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Interactions Between Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone and Serotonin: Implications for the Aetiology and Treatment of Anxiety Disorders
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Anxiety Disorders: Noradrenergic Neurotransmission
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology of GABA A Receptors
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Excitatory Amino Acid Neurotransmission
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Neurobiology and treatment of anxiety: signal transduction and neural plasticity.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Neuropeptides in Anxiety Modulation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Neuroendocrine Aspects of PTSD
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Anxiety Disorders: Clinical Presentation and Epidemiology
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Transcultural Issues
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Challenge Studies in Anxiety Disorders
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Pharmacotherapy of Anxiety
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 New Pharmacological Treatment Approaches for Anxiety Disorders
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Pharmacogenomics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Pharmacoproteomics
Attention for Chapter 11: Neurobiology and treatment of anxiety: signal transduction and neural plasticity.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Neurobiology and treatment of anxiety: signal transduction and neural plasticity.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Anxiety and Anxiolytic Drugs
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/3-540-28082-0_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-022568-3, 978-3-54-028082-8
Authors

C.H. Duman, R.S. Duman, Duman, C.H., Duman, R.S.

Abstract

The stress-dependence and chronic nature of anxiety disorders along with the anxiolytic effectiveness of antidepressant drugs suggests that neuronal plasticity may play a role in the pathophysiology of anxiety. Intracellular signaling pathways are known in many systems to be critical links in the cascades from surface signals to the molecular alterations that result in functional plasticity. Chronic antidepressant treatments can regulate intracellular signaling pathways and can induce molecular, cellular, and structural changes over time. These changes may be important to the anxiolytic effectiveness of these drugs. In addition, the signaling proteins implicated in the actions of chronic antidepressant action, such as cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), have also been implicated in conditioned fear and in anxiety. The cellular mechanisms underlying conditioned fear indicate roles for additional signaling pathways; however, less is known about such mechanisms in anxiety. The challenge to identify intracellular signaling pathways and related molecular and structural changes that are critical to the etiology and treatment of anxiety will further establish the importance of mechanisms of neuronal plasticity in functional outcome and improve treatment strategies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 29%
Neuroscience 3 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#225
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,874
of 139,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.