You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Ballarat Incremental Knowledge Engine
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 17 |
| Book title |
Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Smart Systems and Services
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-15037-1_17 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-215036-4, 978-3-64-215037-1
|
| Authors |
Richard Dazeley, Philip Warner, Scott Johnson, Peter Vamplew |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,485
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,690
of 93,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.