↓ Skip to main content

A critical review of the assumptions underlying drug testing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business and Psychology, September 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critical review of the assumptions underlying drug testing
Published in
Journal of Business and Psychology, September 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf01016746
Authors

Deborah F. Crown, Joseph G. Rosse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 30%
Psychology 2 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#239
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,730
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them