↓ Skip to main content

Addiction Mechanisms, Phenomenology and Treatment

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Designer drugs: how dangerous are they?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 100)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Designer drugs: how dangerous are they?
Chapter number 4
Book title
Addiction Mechanisms, Phenomenology and Treatment
Published in
Journal of neural transmission Supplementum, October 2003
DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-0541-2_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-21-101316-8, 978-3-70-910541-2
Authors

Reneman L, Reneman, L.

Abstract

Of the designer drugs, the amphetamine analogues are the most popular and extensively studied, ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine; MDMA) in particular. They are used recreationally with increasing popularity despite animal studies showing neurotoxic effects to serotonin (5-HT) and/or dopamine (DA) neurones. However, few detailed assessments of risks of these drugs exist in humans. Previously, there were no methods available for directly evaluating the neurotoxic effects of amphetamine analogues in the living human brain. However, development of in vivo neuroimaging tools have begun to provide insights into the effects of MDMA in human brain. In this review, contributions of brain imaging studies on the potential 5-HT and/or DA neurotoxic effects of amphetamine analogues will be highlighted in order to delineate the risks these drugs engender in humans, focusing on MDMA. An overview will be given of PET, SPECT and MR Spectroscopy studies employed in human users of these drugs. Most of these studies provide suggestive evidence that MDMA is neurotoxic to 5-HT neurones, and (meth)amphetamine to DA neurones in humans. These effects seem to be dose-related, leading to functional impairments such as memory loss, and are reversible in several brain regions. However most studies have had a retrospective design, in which evidence is indirect and differs in the degree to which any causative links can be implied between drug use and neurotoxicity. Therefore, at this moment, it cannot be ascertained that humans are susceptible to MDMA-induced 5-HT injury or (meth)amphetamine-induced DA injury. Finally, although little is known about other amphetamine analogues there are important questions as to the safety of these designer drugs as well, in view of the fact that they are chemically closely related to MDMA and some have been shown to be 5-HT neurotoxins in animals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,755,290
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neural transmission Supplementum
#22
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,308
of 53,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neural transmission Supplementum
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them